In this blog, I am recounting the opinions of many Egyptian citizens I have talked with over the past couple of years. While these opinions don't accurately represent any one individual, this blog is more an amalgamation of those thoughts, utterances, and conversations.
Here in Cairo, today is "Civil Disobedience" day.
Around Egypt, people are calling for silent, peaceful, disobedient actions to send a message. They are calling for strikes from work, peaceful protests, and generally are trying to get the message out that they are not happy with one fact:
One year after Mubarek stepped down, little has really changed.
Mubarek was the top dog in the military forces. Removing him allowed for the possibility of change: it gave hope to many Egyptians who before had none. One year later, who is in charge? The other top dogs in the military regime.
Many Egyptian people, especially those who were active in the revolution to begin with, are not happy with this.
So, the call for a peaceful protest.
There are many who are very afraid that it will become something more. I'm holding out for peace.
Further thoughts on the arrests of the NGO workers arrest last week here in Cairo.
Here is a brief summation of "facts" that I've gathered over the past 131 weeks in Cairo from speaking with Egyptians from diverse backgrounds. If there are errors in this post they are present only because we as people are fallible and subject to misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and the like. But, I have done my best to give one perception of Egypt from many locals points of view.
This is in need of, and may receive a few edits soon. But in the interest of publishing without further delay, here it is:
This enraged the revolutionaries and many other citizens in Egypt. Why?
Mubarek for 30 years, beat, tortured, and killed Egyptian citizens. Along the way, he promoted everyone in his family or close circles of friends to positions where they could also abuse and through graft and corruption rape the population of Egypt for whatever they wanted. Look no further than his and his families bank accounts, the current trial for murder and more, and the unavoidable reality here that somewhere around 1/2 of the 80+ million people live in poverty.
At the same time, members of the military own anywhere from 25-45% of the private industries in the country, depending on your source.
It seems to many Egyptian people that the United States was willing to give money to a brutal man whom many Egyptians disagreed with. These same Egyptians were unable to voice their opinions publicly for 30 years out of fear.
Now, because of the arrest of 29 NGO workers, the U.S. is publicly renouncing Egypt in the media and threatening cessation of aid. This seems puzzling (given the previous arrangement) unless you look only a scratch more beneath the surface.
It would seem Egypt has become reliant upon money from the United States. Years and years and years of handouts will do that to a country. Now, these funds have become a significant reality for Egypt, and any individuals or political parties in power stand to gain from the money.
If they are no better than Mubarek, it would seem the U.S. will turn a blind eye to dictatorship, graft, and murder.
So what did he do that made him "family"?
Mubarek protected the interests of the U.S. government. His reward: unimaginable power and freedom to cross any human rights line imaginable, and not be held accountable.
The current government official who is responsible for the arrest of the NGO workers worked for Mubarek. She has for a long time. When he went, though, she (and many others that were pit and parcel a part of his regime) did not. However, her want to arrest and shut down NGO's (based upon a personal vendetta against one in particular that caused her individual hardship) was squelched by Mubarek. Shutting down NGO's is not acceptable, and he would not allow it. Why? This could lead to problems.
Most Egyptian people like NGO's. Even the salafists - a party many claim to be afraid of - learned how to organize and run a democratic party in these same NGO's.
But, you see, spreading ideas like human rights, access to education, and democracy is often frowned upon by authoritarian states or dictatorships - they don't like these ideals as they do "undermine" the established government.
Murdering thousands via the creation of a corrupt police state? Well, it seems that was in the name of democracy and keeping peace in a country under "Emergency Police Law" - on their books as legal military crack downs in emergency situations. They have been that way for over 30 years, despite any wars, uprisings, or other logical triggers for the law.
This meant Egyptians were not legally allowed to criticize the government, not allowed to meet in large groups in public, they were treated as oppositions to the authorities - almost as enemies of their own state.
Public educational systems were ruined. Rife with corruption and designed to fail, the intellectual life and opportunities of many Egyptians were stolen from them.
So all this banter, that many are taking when they read news reports of the current U.S. relations with Egypt, is being taken for a bit more than it's worth.
And more, when the ruling power is still the same ruling power that has existed for 30 years, the same one the Egyptian people do not want, and the same one that has been "okay" for those 30 years, this threat begins to seem it is directed at a different audience all together. It seems if the Egyptian people want the money to continue to stream from the U.S., they better get more aggressive in removing the military state that was allowed (or encouraged as seen by some) to be created by the same U.S.
Talk about mixed messaged to millions of starving people. It's no surprise any group who wants to spin politics here can.
This is the U.S. simply training the new Egypt, and any who wish to move to power in it, how to play ball. It doesn't matter who gets in power. There are a few things that you cannot do if you run a country called Egypt. Check out this recent article for an interesting angle.
Don't mess with the Suez canal, don't disrupt peace with Israel, and don't arrest 29 U.S. citizens in Egypt.
After that, it's up to you to run your country.
This ends the summary of the state of the state as translated for this blog by me.
Here in Cairo, today is "Civil Disobedience" day.
Around Egypt, people are calling for silent, peaceful, disobedient actions to send a message. They are calling for strikes from work, peaceful protests, and generally are trying to get the message out that they are not happy with one fact:
One year after Mubarek stepped down, little has really changed.
Mubarek was the top dog in the military forces. Removing him allowed for the possibility of change: it gave hope to many Egyptians who before had none. One year later, who is in charge? The other top dogs in the military regime.
Many Egyptian people, especially those who were active in the revolution to begin with, are not happy with this.
So, the call for a peaceful protest.
There are many who are very afraid that it will become something more. I'm holding out for peace.
Further thoughts on the arrests of the NGO workers arrest last week here in Cairo.
Here is a brief summation of "facts" that I've gathered over the past 131 weeks in Cairo from speaking with Egyptians from diverse backgrounds. If there are errors in this post they are present only because we as people are fallible and subject to misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and the like. But, I have done my best to give one perception of Egypt from many locals points of view.
This is in need of, and may receive a few edits soon. But in the interest of publishing without further delay, here it is:
Mubarek accepted money from the U.S. for 30 years. In 2009, Hillary Clinton went so far as to say she considered "President and Mrs. Mubarak to be friends of my family", and even until the near end (February 2011) when she was suggesting Egypt was "stable" again referred to him and the regime as family.
This enraged the revolutionaries and many other citizens in Egypt. Why?
Mubarek for 30 years, beat, tortured, and killed Egyptian citizens. Along the way, he promoted everyone in his family or close circles of friends to positions where they could also abuse and through graft and corruption rape the population of Egypt for whatever they wanted. Look no further than his and his families bank accounts, the current trial for murder and more, and the unavoidable reality here that somewhere around 1/2 of the 80+ million people live in poverty.
At the same time, members of the military own anywhere from 25-45% of the private industries in the country, depending on your source.
It seems to many Egyptian people that the United States was willing to give money to a brutal man whom many Egyptians disagreed with. These same Egyptians were unable to voice their opinions publicly for 30 years out of fear.
Now, because of the arrest of 29 NGO workers, the U.S. is publicly renouncing Egypt in the media and threatening cessation of aid. This seems puzzling (given the previous arrangement) unless you look only a scratch more beneath the surface.
It would seem Egypt has become reliant upon money from the United States. Years and years and years of handouts will do that to a country. Now, these funds have become a significant reality for Egypt, and any individuals or political parties in power stand to gain from the money.
If they are no better than Mubarek, it would seem the U.S. will turn a blind eye to dictatorship, graft, and murder.
So what did he do that made him "family"?
Mubarek protected the interests of the U.S. government. His reward: unimaginable power and freedom to cross any human rights line imaginable, and not be held accountable.
The current government official who is responsible for the arrest of the NGO workers worked for Mubarek. She has for a long time. When he went, though, she (and many others that were pit and parcel a part of his regime) did not. However, her want to arrest and shut down NGO's (based upon a personal vendetta against one in particular that caused her individual hardship) was squelched by Mubarek. Shutting down NGO's is not acceptable, and he would not allow it. Why? This could lead to problems.
Most Egyptian people like NGO's. Even the salafists - a party many claim to be afraid of - learned how to organize and run a democratic party in these same NGO's.
But, you see, spreading ideas like human rights, access to education, and democracy is often frowned upon by authoritarian states or dictatorships - they don't like these ideals as they do "undermine" the established government.
Murdering thousands via the creation of a corrupt police state? Well, it seems that was in the name of democracy and keeping peace in a country under "Emergency Police Law" - on their books as legal military crack downs in emergency situations. They have been that way for over 30 years, despite any wars, uprisings, or other logical triggers for the law.
This meant Egyptians were not legally allowed to criticize the government, not allowed to meet in large groups in public, they were treated as oppositions to the authorities - almost as enemies of their own state.
Public educational systems were ruined. Rife with corruption and designed to fail, the intellectual life and opportunities of many Egyptians were stolen from them.
So all this banter, that many are taking when they read news reports of the current U.S. relations with Egypt, is being taken for a bit more than it's worth.
And more, when the ruling power is still the same ruling power that has existed for 30 years, the same one the Egyptian people do not want, and the same one that has been "okay" for those 30 years, this threat begins to seem it is directed at a different audience all together. It seems if the Egyptian people want the money to continue to stream from the U.S., they better get more aggressive in removing the military state that was allowed (or encouraged as seen by some) to be created by the same U.S.
Talk about mixed messaged to millions of starving people. It's no surprise any group who wants to spin politics here can.
This is the U.S. simply training the new Egypt, and any who wish to move to power in it, how to play ball. It doesn't matter who gets in power. There are a few things that you cannot do if you run a country called Egypt. Check out this recent article for an interesting angle.
Don't mess with the Suez canal, don't disrupt peace with Israel, and don't arrest 29 U.S. citizens in Egypt.
After that, it's up to you to run your country.
This ends the summary of the state of the state as translated for this blog by me.
No comments:
Post a Comment